AORN Journal
Volume 92, Issue 3 , Pages 272-287, September 2010

The Development of a Pressure Ulcer Risk-Assessment Scale for Perioperative Patients

Abstract 

The high incidence of pressure ulcer development in patients in the perioperative setting indicates the need for improved risk assessment and the use of preventive measures. A clinical nurse specialist used Dever's Epidemiological Model as the theoretical framework to develop a perioperative pressure ulcer risk-assessment scale. The risk factors for the scale were based on findings from a review of the literature. The scale, along with a demographic questionnaire and an evaluation form, was distributed to 12 nurses and three anesthesiologists to obtain expert opinion to further the design of the scale. Twelve participants returned the forms. Only four of the participants had previous experience with a pressure ulcer risk-assessment scale. The results indicated that diabetes should be included as a risk factor category and that preexisting skin ulcerations, breakdowns, and conditions should be addressed within the scale. The participants unanimously agreed that moisture is an important factor to assess. Validation of each risk factor is essential to improve the reliability of the scale before its implementation.

Key words: pressure ulcer, risk-assessment scale, perioperative risk factors

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0001-2092(10)00594-6

doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2009.09.035

AORN Journal
Volume 92, Issue 3 , Pages 272-287, September 2010