AORN Journal
Volume 90, Issue 3 , Pages 347-380, September 2009

Infantile and Juvenile Scoliosis: The Crooked Path to Diagnosis and Treatment

  • Jane Maureen Wick, RN, BSN

      Affiliations

    • Jane Maureen Wick, RN, BSN, is a surgical staff nurse at Shriners Hospital, Portland, OR. Ms Wick has no declared affiliation that could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest in publishing this article.
  • ,
  • Julie Konze, RN, BSN

      Affiliations

    • Julie Konze, RN, BSN, is the surgical services charge nurse at Shriners Hospital, Portland, OR. Ms Konze has no declared affiliation that could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest in publishing this article.
  • ,
  • Kelly Alexander, RN, BSN

      Affiliations

    • Kelly Alexander, RN, BSN, is a care coordination nurse at Shriners Hospital, Portland, OR. Ms Alexander has no declared affiliation that could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest in publishing this article.
  • ,
  • Chris Sweeney, RN, ADN

      Affiliations

    • Chris Sweeney, RN, ADN, is a care coordination nurse at Shriners Hospital, Portland, OR. Ms Sweeney has no declared affiliation that could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest in publishing this article.

Article Outline

ABSTRACT 

Most cases of scoliosis are diagnosed and treated during adolescence; many are detected in school screening programs. For a small percentage of children, however, the onset of scoliosis occurs much earlier than adolescence.

Infantile scoliosis (ie, onset from birth to two years of age) and juvenile scoliosis (ie, onset from three to nine years of age) involve very different diagnoses and treatment regimens than adolescent scoliosis. Early onset scoliosis may resolve with growth or may require nonsurgical treatment (eg, orthosis, body cast); surgical intervention (eg, halo traction, growing rods, vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib); or a combination of both. AORN J 90 (September 2009) 347-376. © AORN, Inc, 2009.

Key words:  scoliosis , infantile scoliosis , juvenile scoliosis , idiopathic scoliosis , congenital scoliosis , neuromuscular scoliosis , orthosis , halo traction , serial casting , growing rods , vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib

 

Scoliosis is an abnormal lateral and rotational curvature of the vertebral column. One segment of the spinal column is a vertebra. Humans usually have 33 vertebrae—seven cervical; 12 thoracic; five lumbar; five sacral (fused into one bone, the sacrum); and four coccygeal (fused into one bone, the coccyx).

The term scoliosis refers to a sideward (ie, right or left) curve in the spine and is derived from the Greek word skol, meaning twists and turns.1 There are historical references to scoliosis in ancient Hindu materials dating as far back as 3500 BC to 1800 BC and from the writings of Hippocrates around 400 BC.1, 2, 3 The prevalence of the condition is only estimated because scoliosis is not a medical condition for which reporting is mandated. According to the National Scoliosis Foundation, an estimated 6 million people have scoliosis in the United States.3

The Scoliosis Research Society, an international group that studies spinal deformities, has standardized the classifications of deformity and the associated terminology (Table 1).4 For the purposes of this article, onset of scoliosis from birth to two years of age is considered infantile, onset from three to nine years of age is considered juvenile, and onset from 10 years to 17 years is considered adolescent. Adult scoliosis has an onset of 18 years and older. Some spine surgeons advocate replacing the age-related terms infantile and juvenile with the broader terms early-onset scoliosis and late-onset scoliosis, depending on whether the onset is before or after five years of age.1, 2

Table 1. Scoliosis Research Society Glossary of Terms1
Compensatory curve

A minor curve above or below a major curve that may or may not be structural.

End vertebrae

The vertebrae that define the ends of a curve in a frontal or sagittal projection.

Cephalad end vertebra

The first vertebra in the cephalad direction from a curve apex whose superior surface is tilted maximally toward the concavity of the curve.

Caudad end vertebra

The first vertebra in the caudad direction from a curve apex whose inferior surface is tilted maximally toward the concavity of the curve.

Kyphosis

Posterior, convex angulation of the spine.

Lordosis

Anterior, convex angulation of the spine.

Major curve

A curve with the largest Cobb measurement on a long cassette upright coronal x-ray of the spine.

Minor curve

Any curve that does not have the largest Cobb measurement on a long cassette upright coronal x-ray of the spine.

Pelvic obliquity

Angulation of the pelvis from the horizontal in the frontal plane (ie, related to scoliosis above the pelvis), possibly secondary to a contraction below the pelvis; if it is a result of a leg length inequality, the leg lengths should be equalized to create a level pelvis for measurement purposes.

Risser sign

The state of ossification of the iliac apophysis, noted in a frontal-plane x-ray of the pelvis, used to denote the degree of skeletal maturity on a scale of 0 to 5 where

0 = no evidence of ossification,

1 = 25% iliac apophysis ossification,

2 = 50% iliac apophysis ossification,

3 = 75% iliac apophysis ossification,

4 = 100% iliac apophysis ossification, and

5 = iliac apophysis fuses to the iliac crest.

Sagittal spinal balance

Alignment of the midpoint of the C7 vertebral body to the posterior superior corner of the sacrum on a long cassette upright lateral radiograph of the spine.

1. Lenke LG; SRS Terminology Committee and Working Group on Spinal Classification. Revised glossary of terms. Scoliosis Research Society. http://www.srs.org/professionals/glossary/glossary.php. Accessed July 1, 2009.

Back to Article Outline

Classification of Scoliosis 

Eighty percent of patients with scoliosis are classified as having idiopathic scoliosis because a cause cannot be determined. The remaining cases of scoliosis are divided into two types: nonstructural (ie, functional) and structural.1, 3

Nonstructural scoliosis may be considered compensatory or postural because it may be related to posture, pelvic tilt, flexion deformities at the hip or knee, or to a leg length discrepancy.3 In nonstructural scoliosis, when the patient is seated or recumbent, the lateral curve of the spine resolves.3 Other causes of nonstructural scoliosis are tumors, disc herniation, or spondylolisthesis (ie, forward displacement of a lumbar vertebra on the one below). In these situations, removal of the cause resolves the scoliosis.1, 3, 5

Structural scoliosis may be related to

congenital spinal column abnormalities (ie, congenital scoliosis);

a response to a neuromuscular disorder; or

part of a syndrome (ie, syndromic scoliosis).

This article addresses idiopathic scoliosis and scoliosis related to structural causes.

Scoliosis curves are classified as primary (ie, major) or secondary (ie, compensatory/minor). A primary scoliosis curve is a more structural curve with less flexibility and greater potential for clinical deformity. A secondary scoliosis curve is a compensatory curve that balances the primary curve. It is more flexible and is less structural and less deforming in nature.5 This distinction is important for treating scoliosis curves because correcting the primary curves results in an improvement of the compensatory curves. Scoliosis treatment depends on three factors: the cause of the condition, the severity of the condition, and the age of the patient at the time of presentation.

The age of onset has important implications for the management of scoliosis. Typically, a teenager with a 60-degree, idiopathic curve is managed quite successfully with a posterior instrumented spinal fusion. If a young child with the same 60-degree curve were managed in the same manner, the anterior spine would continue to grow while the posterior spine remained fused. This would lead to crankshaft phenomenon, which is a rotation of the spine around the posterior fusion mass, resulting in a progressive increase in the spinal deformity.6, 7 Loss of growth in the spine may result in a foreshortened trunk and a loss of chest-cavity volume, resulting in a loss of normal lung growth that could potentially lead to future serious cardiopulmonary compromise. For this reason, other interventions have been developed for managing early onset scoliosis. These treatments take into consideration the future growth of the child's spine as well as growth of the child's rib cage and lungs.

Back to Article Outline

Idiopathic Scoliosis 

The most common of all spine deformities in children is idiopathic scoliosis.5 The diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis is one of exclusion after ruling out other causes.8 Although the cause of idiopathic scoliosis is unknown, there is a genetic predisposition for development of idiopathic scoliosis.9 Infantile idiopathic scoliosis is more prevalent in males and usually is detected by six months of age. It is most common in children of European descent. Infantile idiopathic scoliosis has been estimated to account for only 0.5% of all cases of idiopathic scoliosis in the United States.3

Infantile idiopathic scoliosis curves normally occur in the thoracic spine and are more often convex to the left.3, 6 Many of the diagnosed cases of infantile scoliosis spontaneously resolve without treatment by the time the child reaches three years of age.3, 6, 10 Persistent curves can become severe, requiring extensive treatment. Initially, these children are treated with bracing. If compliance with the bracing regimen is a problem or if the curve progresses, serial casting is the next option. The decision to perform surgery is based primarily on the inability to control a curve with nonsurgical interventions.9

Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis comprises about 10% to 15% of all cases of idiopathic scoliosis in children.11 Boys are affected slightly more than girls at the younger end of the age spectrum, and the spinal curve is often left-sided. At the upper end of the age spectrum, juvenile idiopathic scoliosis is more like adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, with more girls being affected than boys, and the spinal curve is more often right-sided (Figure 1).11 Some clinicians consider this form of scoliosis to be a malignant subtype of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (ie, with a tendency to progress to severe or very severe deformity that compromises respiratory function) because of its high rate of curve progression and the need for surgical treatment.3 Curves of 20 degrees or more, especially those demonstrating progression, should be treated rather than observed.5 Juvenile curves of 30 degrees or more tend to continue to worsen without treatment; nearly 95% of children with juvenile curves of 30 degrees or more eventually require surgical treatment.11

Back to Article Outline

Congenital Scoliosis 

Congenital scoliosis is a fixed spinal deformity present at birth and caused by a deformity in the bony structure of one or more vertebrae resulting in longitudinal spine growth imbalance. The condition affects approximately one in 10,000 Americans,3 and girls are affected more often than boys (60% versus 40%).3, 5 Congenital scoliosis (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4) is classified as

failure of segmentation,

failure of formation, or

a combination of both.12

Depending on the location of the abnormality and the potential for affecting spinal growth, the deformity can be relatively static and benign or progressive and quite malignant in severity, leading to rapid curve progression. The location of the defect in the vertebra will determine the type of deformity: scoliosis, lordosis, kyphosis, or a combination (Table 2).

Table 2. Types of Deformities in Congenital Scoliosis
Failure of formation defects (Type I)
Partial (ie, wedged vertebra)1(p2149)
A solid body having the shape of an acute-angled triangular prism.
Complete (ie, hemivertebra)1(p867)
A congenital defect of the vertebral column in which one side of a vertebra fails to develop completely.
Failure of segmentation defects (Type II)
Partial (ie, bar vertebra)1(p203)
A segment of tissue or bone (ie, anterior, posterior, lateral, mixed) that unites two or more similar structures.
Complete (ie, block vertebra)1(p2118)
Congenitally fused hypoplastic vertebral bodies which, on radiographs, give the appearance of a more or less solid bony mass.
Mixed defects (Type III)
Formation1(p761)
The act of giving form and shape.
Segmentation1(p1742)
The act of dividing into segments.

1. Stedman's Medical Dictionary. 28th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

Congenital scoliosis is likely to worsen during growth, and the most severe deformities involve the thoracolumbar region of the spine.12 Patients with this condition require extensive radiologic examinations including three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the spine. Early detection is important to rule out progressive types of deformities and intraspinal pathology, which can lead to neurological deficits. It is important to rule out other associated spinal cord anomalies, such as Arnold-Chiari malformation; syrinx; lipoma of the cord; tethered cord; diastematomyelia (ie, congenital length-wise division of the spinal cord); and other pathological conditions8 (Table 3). Some congenital scoliosis deformities require surgical interventions not addressed in this article, including vertebral osteotomies, short segment fusions, hemivertebrectomy, and surgical correction of the associated neurological conditions.

Table 3. Pathological Conditions Associated with Scoliosis
Arachnoid cyst1(p480)

A fluid-filled cyst lined with arachnoid membrane, frequently situated near the lateral aspect of the lateral sulcus of the cerebral hemisphere; usually congenital in origin.

Arnold-Chiari malformation1(p1147,1693)

Malformed posterior fossa structures associated with caudad traction and displacement of the rhombencephalon (ie, hindbrain, includes pons, cerebellum, and medulla oblongata), caused by tethering of the spinal cord; may be accompanied in some cases by spina bifida and associated anomalies, such as meningomyelocele.

Cerebral palsy1(p1408)

A generic term for various types of motor function abnormalities present at birth or beginning in early childhood. Causes are both hereditary and acquired and are classified as intrauterine, natal, and early postnatal. Motor disturbances include diplegia, hemiplegia, quadriplegia, choreoathetosis, and ataxia.

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia1(p879)

Failure of the left pleuroperitoneal membrane to fuse with the posterior margin of the diaphragm; most commonly occurs on the left side.

Dextro (scoliosis)1(p527)

Spinal convexity to the right.

Diastematomyelia1(p534)

Complete or incomplete sagittal division of the spinal cord by an osseous or fibrocartilaginous septum.

Hypotonia1(p939)

Condition in which there is a diminution or loss of muscular tonicity.

Levo (scoliosis)1(p1078)

Spinal convexity to the left.

Lipoma1(p1107)

A benign neoplasm of adipose tissue composed of mature fat cells.

Meningocele1(p1183)

Protrusion of the membranes of the brain or spinal cord through a defect in the cranium or spinal column.

Myelodysplasia1(p1269)

An abnormality in development of the spinal cord, especially the lower part; term is sometimes inappropriately used for spina bifida occulta.

Syringomyelia1(p1922)

Longitudinal cavities lined by dense, gliogenous tissue in the spinal cord, which is not caused by vascular insufficiency; associated with scoliosis of the lumbar spine, although some cases are associated with low-grade gliomas or vascular malformations of the spinal cord.

Syrinx spinal cord1(p1923)

A pathologic tubular cavity in the brain or spinal cord with a gliotic lining; rarely used synonym for fistula.

Tethered cord syndrome1(p1916)

Abnormal low positioning of the distal spinal cord by the filum terminale (eg, below L2 vertebra); may be associated with incontinence, progressive motor and sensory impairment in the legs, pain, and scoliosis.

1. Stedman's Medical Dictionary. 28th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.

Back to Article Outline

Neuromuscular Scoliosis 

Neuromuscular scoliosis is a term that includes the neuropathic (ie, involving the nervous system) and myopathic (ie, involving the muscles) categories of scoliosis.3, 13, 14 This form of scoliosis is associated with many conditions such as cerebral palsy, spina bifida, muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, and paralysis from spinal cord injury.15, 16 The spinal curve is secondary to muscle imbalance. Children with neuromuscular diseases generally are in one of two categories—spastic or flaccid.13, 14, 16 Children with spasticity have very tight muscles and poor brain control over their muscles, and they exhibit rigid posturing. Children with flaccidity have weak muscle control and appear “floppy.”14

The likelihood of neuromuscular scoliosis developing varies with the underlying diagnosis. The age of onset and severity of scoliosis is strongly related to the degree of neuromuscular involvement. Children who are paraplegic or quadriplegic before age 10 and children who have spina bifida with a high level of paralysis have a 100% chance of developing neuromuscular scoliosis.14 In contrast, among patients with cerebral palsy, patients with spastic quadriplegia have a 60% to 70% chance of developing neuromuscular scoliosis; a child with hemiplegic cerebral palsy has only a 5% chance.14 The age of onset also varies with etiology related to the progression of symptoms. A child with spinal muscular atrophy presents with a spinal deformity at a younger age than a child with muscular dystrophy.14 In general, the greater the degree of neuromuscular involvement, the greater the likelihood of scoliosis occurring and the greater the severity.13 Early detection is important, children with neuromuscular involvement should be checked annually and assessed for the development of spinal deformities.14

Scoliosis in a child with neuromuscular disease is only one facet of his or her disease. These children may have complex conditions with multisystem involvement and difficulty performing activities of daily living. Potential comorbidities include

mental retardation;

seizures;

vision and hearing loss;

pulmonary problems;

skin breakdown related to being insensate; and

hip, knee, and other joint contractures that complicate positioning.14

The diagnosis of neuromuscular scoliosis is usually made when a caregiver notices a problem with the child's ability to sit in his or her wheelchair. When the curve is present, it continues to worsen as a result of posture and gravity. Modifications may be made to the wheelchair, and the child may be braced and padded to prevent skin breakdown, but the curve will continue to progress. The change in pelvic obliquity (ie, horizontal angulation of the pelvis in the frontal plane) results in an imbalance requiring the child to use one or both hands for support, and thus functionally losing the use of one or both arms.14

As the curve grows larger, it will begin to affect the child's pulmonary function. Eventually pulmonary capacity is reduced by collapse of the thorax and elevation of the diaphragm. This may be manifested by the child developing recurrent pneumonia, especially if the patient has coexisting muscle weakness secondary to neuromuscular disease. For some children with neuromuscular involvement (eg, Duchenne muscular dystrophy), this deterioration of pulmonary function may require earlier surgical intervention depending on skeletal indications (eg, Risser sign).16

Patients with more involved neuromuscular issues usually progress to needing some type of spinal stabilization. During their juvenile years, these children's curves usually can be controlled by bracing and nonsurgical interventions, but these measures usually fail at the onset of the adolescent growth spurt.13, 14, 16 Surgical options to treat neuromuscular scoliosis generally are divided into two groups based on whether patients are ambulatory with curves that are more idiopathic in nature or wheelchair dependent with large “C” shaped paralytic curves. In ambulatory patients with less involved neuromuscular issues and a pelvis that is generally level, the fusion extends from the levels above and below the curve, similar to the treatment for idiopathic scoliosis. In nonambulatory children with more involved neuromuscular issues, the fusion usually extends from the upper thoracic area to the sacrum to correct the pelvic obliquity and achieve a stable sitting position.14

Surgery enables nonambulatory patients to sit erect, improving functions of daily living. For patients with pulmonary involvement, surgery can help lessen occurrences of pneumonia and decrease swallowing and aspiration problems. The general outcome is an overall improvement in their quality of life.

Back to Article Outline

Syndromes with Spine and Chest Deformities 

As with neuromuscular scoliosis, children with syndromes present with a wide variety of complexities in addition to their spine and chest deformities. The age of onset is dependent on the type of syndrome and associated congenital defects. For example, children with syndromes that include congenital rib fusions require earlier intervention related to pulmonary issues than children who develop syndrome-related scoliosis at a later age. Many of these children present with cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, renal, and other associated medical issues that complicate their care (Table 4). Surgical team members need to be aware of the syndromic comorbidities that may require special interventions. These may include

airway and bleeding problems,

autoimmune or infection risks,

the potential for positioning difficulties related to contractures, and

physical limitations related to their condition.

Table 4. Terms Used with Neuromuscular Disorders or Syndromes of the Spine or Chest
Achondroplasia1(p10)

Premature fusion of bones, and chest wall deformities (eg, spine curvature, small rib cage) may result in impaired respiratory function because of thoracic constriction; is autosomal dominant, the most common type of short-limbed dwarfism.

Arnold-Chiari malformation1(p29)

Caudal displacement of the cerebellum and lower brainstem; type II is present in virtually all children with meningomyelocele, paresthesias, and weakness.

Arthrogryposis (ie, curved joints)1(p30)

Multiple joint contractures of prenatal onset with fixed flexion or contracture deformities that severely limit joint mobility; occasionally scoliosis, chest myopathy, and skeletal deformities may result in alveolar hypoventilation and restrictive lung disease.

Cat-eye syndrome1(p50)

Rare chromosome 22 disorder with many symptoms: congenital cardiac defects, renal abnormalities, eye problems, anal atresia, micrognathia, cleft palate, and scoliosis.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth1(p54)

Slowly progressive, autosomal dominant neuropathy with muscle wasting and early loss of deep tendon reflexes; severe disease may lead to respiratory insufficiency.

Coffin Siris syndrome1(p61)

Genetic disorder exhibiting symptoms such as hypotonia, congenital cardiac defects, microcephaly, joint laxicity, and vertebral abnormalities.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy1(p87,88)

X-linked deletion mutations in the dystrophin gene that prevent expression of dystrophin in skeletal muscles; symptoms include respiratory muscle weakness, restrictive lung disease, heart arrhythmias, generalized myopathy, and neuromuscular scoliosis.

Ehlers Danlos syndrome type 41(p93)

Presents as 1 of 10 forms ranging from mild to severe, with a defect in collagen synthesis resulting in spinal deformities, down-sloping ribs, hypermobility, ligamentous laxity, lax joints, tendency to dislocate and subluxate, and bleeding disorders.

Ellis van Creveld syndrome1(p97)

Chondroactodermal dysplasia resulting in dwarfism; cardiothoracic malformations; micrognathia; pelvic dysplasia; long, narrow thorax with short ribs; restrictive lung disease; and pulmonary hypoplasia.

Escobar syndrome (ie, multiple pterygium syndrome)1(p208)

Autosomal recessive syndrome characterized by multiple pterygia (ie, webbing of the skin); severe micrognathia; severe kyphoscoliosis that may lead to restrictive lung disease; muscular atrophy; and vertebral fusion (ie, usually cervical).

Fetal alcohol syndrome1(p111)

Disorder of permanent birth defects ranging from craniofacial defects, growth problems, central nervous system defects, chest/rib abnormalities, cardiac defects, mild-to-moderate microcephaly, and hypotonia.

Friedreich's ataxia1(p117)

Disorder of unknown etiology that is characterized by neurologic degeneration; severe kyphoscoliosis may result in decreased respiratory function.

Coldenhar syndrome1(p128)

Fetal vascular accident or autosomal recessive or dominant syndrome that is characterized by vertebral anomalies and rib anomalies as well as numerous facial and ear deformities.

Jarcho-Levin syndrome (ie, spondylothoracic dysplasia)1(p156)

An autosomal recessive form of dwarfism distinguished by a short trunk with malformed thoracic cage and multiple thoracic vertebral defects, including hemivertebrae, vertebral fusions, kyphoscoliosis, and lordosis.

Jeune's syndrome (ie, asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy)1(p156)

An autosomal recessive disorder characterized by severe thoracic hypoplasia and deformity.

Klippel-Feil syndrome1(p164)

Sporadically occurring disorder in which there is limited mobility of the cervical spine secondary to vertebral fusion, scoliosis, thoracic or lumbar vertebral anomalies, or sacral agenesis.

Larsen syndrome1(p170)

A dysmorphic syndrome that is characterized by flat facies (ie, the front portion of the head including the eyes, nose, mouth, forehead, cheeks, and chin but excluding the ears); multiple joint dislocations; restrictive lung disease secondary to thoracic kyphoscoliosis; and vertebral anomalies.

Marfan syndrome1(p184)

An autosomal dominant syndrome with wide-spread manifestations in both skeletal and connective tissue; has the possibility of multiple scoliosis manifestations.

Morquio syndrome1(p204-206)

An autosomal recessive syndrome with chest (ie, pectus carinatum) deformities (eg, rib flaring, respiratory insufficiency) and spine deformities (eg, cervical instability, kyphoscoliosis, lordosis).

MURCS association1(p210)

MURCS (ie, [mu]llerian, [r]enal, [c]ervicothoracic [s]omit) association is an autosomal recessive condition that has an association of deformities (eg, cervicothoracic vertebral defects, winged scapula, rib anomalies).

Myotonic dystrophy1(p212)

A multisystem disease associated with dystrophy of the muscles (eg, hypotonia), including weakness of the respiratory muscles.

Neurofibromatosis1(p218)

An autosomal dominant condition with multiple possible manifestations such as schwannomas of the dorsal roots of the spinal cord; restrictive lung disease from kyphoscoliosis; and/or neurofibromas of the cranial nerves, spinal cord, nerve roots, or peripheral nerves.

Osteogenesis imperfecta (ie, type I to type 4)1(p229)

An autosomal dominant disorder in which the bones are extremely fragile and may be easily fractured, leading to multiple deformities of limbs and spine.

Poland sequence1(p244)

Unilateral hypoplasia or aplasia of the chest wall muscles, hypoplasia of the chest wall structures, rib defects, vertebral segmentation, and scapular anomalies.

Rett syndrome1(p265)

Syndrome of progressive encephalopathy that occurs only in girls who experience normal development until 6 to 18 months of age, at which point developmental regression begins, characterized by axial hypotonia, limb spasticity, kyphoscoliosis, and acquired microcephaly.

Scimitar syndrome1(p278)

An autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by a type of partial anomalous pulmonary venous return with a hypoplastic right lower lobe of the lung.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 (ie, Werdnig-Hoffman disease)1(p320)

Acute infantile SMA, an autosomal recessive condition characterized by respiratory distress, hypotonia, and profound weakness that presents in the first 6 months of life with 1/3 present in utero; survival beyond age 2 is very rare.

SMA (ie, Werdnig-Hoffman disease) type 21(p320)

Chronic intermediate SMA, an autosomal recessive condition characterized by respiratory embarrassment from severe scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis that presents around 6 months of age; after previously normal development, motor milestones become delayed.

SMA (ie, Kugelberg-Welander disease) type 31(p168)

Juvenile SMA, an autosomal recessive lower motor neuron disease without sensory loss characterized by progressive muscle weakness and atrophy and decreased pulmonary function; kyphoscoliosis and contractures occur later in the disease.

VATER association1(p313)

VATER (ie, [v]ertebral anomalies, [a]nal atresia, [t]racheoesophageal fistula, [e]sophageal atresia, and [r]adial/renal dysplasia) association consists of vertebral anomalies such as hemivertebrae, vertebral fusion, and dysplastic vertebrae.

1. Baum VC, O’Flaherty JE. Anesthesia for Genetic, Metabolic, and Dysmorphic Syndromes of Childhood. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.

Back to Article Outline

Physical and Radiologic Examination 

The initial evaluation of a child with scoliosis should include a detailed history and physical examination. The clinician reviews the family history because of the genetic basis for many causes of scoliosis. As a three-dimensional condition, scoliosis requires careful analysis in both sagittal and coronal planes.9, 12 The clinician first performs an Adams forward-bending test—named after William Adams, MD, who first described the maneuver—to assess spinal movement and rotational prominences such as pronounced rib hump.9 The majority of patients with early-onset scoliosis require an MRI scan for a complete spinal evaluation to rule out causes related to neuropathology.17

Standard radiological tests that are performed for diagnosing scoliosis are standing posterior-anterior and lateral x-rays of the spine. The lateral views are important for assessing the three-dimensional properties of scoliosis to determine whether the child has an associated kyphosis, lordosis, or junctional curve in the sagittal plane. Supine, maximum side-bending x-rays to the left and right are taken to assess the flexibility of the curve. These films help determine the levels of instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis by assessing the flexibility of the spine. The bending films also may be helpful in determining whether a patient would benefit from an anterior spinal release before undergoing a posterior instrumented correction.

The Cobb method, a universally agreed upon measurement, has been in use since 1948 to measure the magnitude of spinal curves.3 The radiologist, surgeon, or resident draws lines parallel to the end plates of the vertebral bodies at the two end vertebrae of the curve to be measured. He or she draws a second line perpendicular to each of the lines. The angle formed by the intersection of these lines is the Cobb angle (Figure 5). There is a standard measurement error of three to five degrees based on the way the x-ray was taken, the position of the patient, and the way the lines are drawn. This error factor should be taken into account since the Cobb measurement may not be exactly the same each time the spine is measured.18 The Cobb angle is useful as a monitoring tool to measure progression or correction of scoliosis curves.19 A limitation of the Cobb angle is that it does not measure the amount of vertebral rotation or alignment of the spine, nor does it account for the degree of tilt on the endpoint vertebrae. Rotation is assessed by looking at other indicators on the films, such as vertebral pedicle alignment to the midline.

Back to Article Outline

Orthosis/Bracing—The First Approach to Scoliosis Treatment 

Descriptions of scoliosis and its treatment have been mentioned in literature throughout the ages. Past treatments included everything from posture corrections and exercises to plaster jackets and mass-produced corsets.3 In the 19th and early 20th centuries, treatments for scoliosis primarily included the use of braces and other devices that stabilized the spine and reduced or prevented further disfigurement.3

The terms brace and orthosis are interchangeable; orthosis is the professional term and brace is the lay term. Thoracic lumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO) is a descriptive term, which applies to any orthosis that addresses the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral portions of the spine (Table 5). The type of orthosis used is regional, based primarily on the physician's personal preference and the availability of skilled orthotists.

Table 5. Types of Orthoses for Treatment of Scoliosis1
Type of bracesConditionGroupApplicationWear time/style of fitting
Thoracic lumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO) Boston style brace made with a co-poly/plastic frame and an aliplast foam linerScoliosis (ie, idiopathic and neuromuscular)
Curves < 45 degrees

Immature skeleton

Snug fitting flexible system using 3-point pressure for curve correction; curve apex up to C7

Young child with curves > 20 degrees after casting to allow for growth

Adolescent curves 20 degrees to 45 degrees depending on the rate of progression and remaining growth

Infantile, juvenile, and adolescent
16 to 23 hours per day/night

Measured or molded

TLSO Providence orthosis made with a co-poly/plastic frame and an aliplast foam linerIdiopathic scoliosis
Curves < 35 degrees

Juvenile and adolescent
Nighttime only

Measured

Cervicothoracic lumbar sacral Milwaukee orthosis made with a metal or plastic super-structure and leather pelvic sectionScoliosis and kyphosis
Curves with the apex above T7/T8

Higher thoracic apex

Infantile, juvenile, and adolescent
Full time use up to 23 hours/day

Molded

Low-profile TLSO made with a low-density polyethylene frame with a linerScoliosis and kyphosis
Hyperkyphotic thoracic spine (ie, Scheuremann's kyphosis > 60 degrees)

Lower thoracic apex

Juvenile and adolescent
Daytime only

Measured or molded

Soft Boston-type TLSO made with a co-poly/plastic frame and an aliplast and firm foam linerNeuromuscular
Flexible curves in low-tone patients

Infantile, juvenile, and adolescent
Up to 16 hours/day when the patient is out of bed

Measured or molded

Table courtesy of Todd Dewees, CPO, staff orthotist, Shriners Hospital, Portland, OR.

1. Manual of Brace Treatment for Idiopathic Scoliosis. Milwaukee, WI: Scoliosis Research Society; 2003. http://www.srs.org/professionals/bracing_manuals. Accessed July 1, 2009.

The goal of bracing is to slow the inevitable progression of the curve and allow the child to grow until a more definitive treatment, such as surgery, is performed (Figure 6a, Figure 6b).7, 20 Whether a child is a candidate for a brace is contingent on the flexibility of the curve, as determined by the bending radiographs.20 A brace will do little good for a curve that is rigid and does not correct (ie, get smaller) on the bending films. A brace rarely corrects scoliosis permanently. Braces also do not work well for a congenital deformity but may be used to correct compensatory curves.

Children usually are instructed to wear the brace full-time, removing the brace only for bathing and special occasions. Patients with thoracolumbar and lumbar curves are more successfully treated with a brace; one treatment option is nighttime bracing (ie, wearing the brace 10 to 12 hours at night). Cervical curves are not typically treated with a brace. As the child grows, new braces need to be fabricated every 12 to 18 months. Most braces function by exerting pressure on the rib cage; therefore, physicians are concerned about pulmonary function and lung development in young children. Modifications may be made to braces for children with special needs (eg, gastric reflux, feeding tubes, colostomies).20

At Shriners Hospital, Portland, Oregon, the Boston and Providence nighttime braces are the most commonly used orthoses for treating juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. The next most common is the soft Boston-type orthosis for treatment of neuromuscular low-tone curves and infantile scoliosis. The low-profile scoliosis or kyphosis corrective orthosis is used less frequently, but is the preferred device for treating Scheuermann's kyphosis. The Milwaukee brace, one of the first braces developed for scoliosis treatment, is less popular because of its cosmetic design. This brace is made of leather and metal with a high neck ring and shoulder supports. It is the only brace that can manage curves in the upper spine and may include a chin extension if needed.20 It takes a skilled orthotist to make it fit comfortably.

Approximately 70% of TLSOs are measured, not molded. If a child is progressing from serial casting to a TLSO, the mold for the orthosis will be made in surgery at the time of the final cast application. Whether the brace is measured or molded, it typically takes about two weeks to construct (Figure 7).

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 7. 

    Sample braces (back row, from left) Milwaukee brace with mandibular extension; Providence brace for a double curve; Boston brace for a left-thoracic/right-lumbar curve; and Boston brace for a right-thoracic/left-lumbar curve. (Front row, from left) posterior view of a Boston brace; posterior view of a soft Boston brace; low-profile, corrective kyphosis brace; and Providence brace for a lumbar curve.

Back to Article Outline

Serial Casting 

A cast can be more efficient than bracing to manage spinal curves, with the added advantage of patient compliance since it cannot be removed. Many parents find casting preferable to bracing because a cast eliminates the difficulty of putting a brace on an uncooperative young child.21 Indications for casting include noncompliance with bracing or a progression of the curve despite bracing. After a course of serial casting, the deformity may correct sufficiently to allow bracing to be reinstituted.

In some cases, casting may be a definitive treatment. Research in the United Kingdom demonstrated that treating noncongenital scoliosis with serial casts beginning at 12 months of age with an average curve of 32 degrees resulted in a reduction of scoliosis to less than 10 degrees at maturity.21 Patients who started treatment at 18 months or later with larger curves averaging 52 degrees achieved less correction but maintained their deformities at a similar degree of magnitude. This means their curves did not progress, which is an achievement in this age group. Casting, with the goal of curing the scoliosis, requires frequent cast changes under anesthesia during the period of rapid growth for children younger than age two.10, 21 Children older than two years of age require less frequent cast changes and may have a higher rate of recurrence. A brace is still needed after the casting treatment to maintain correction while the child is growing.10, 21

Cast application 

The surgeons at Shriners Hospital, Portland, use the Cotrel casting technique, commonly referred to as a Risser cast.2 If the patient is undergoing a body cast application for the first time, teaching that includes cast care and play therapy is initiated for the patient and his or her family members. Radiographs of the spine (eg, posterior-anterior, lateral, bending films) are performed to determine the degree of scoliosis needing correction and where the corrective forces should be applied. X-rays may be performed out of the cast to evaluate the curve progression.

For children who have already been in a cast, the cast is removed before surgery to allow time for bathing and skin assessment. The nurse fits the patient with a silver-impregnated T-shirt. Silver has antimicrobial properties that decrease skin breakdown during the eight to 12 weeks that the patient will wear the cast. The patient is transferred to a modified pediatric casting table (ie, Mehta table), a specially designed table that allows circumferential body cast application while traction is applied to the patient's head and pelvis to allow for correction of the scoliosis (Figure 8, Figure 9). Special care is taken to position the patient on the table with a head support, padding to the arms, slings for the feet to suspend the legs, a shoulder support, and perineal support to hold the patient suspended.

When the surgical team has finished positioning the patient, the table pad is lowered to allow complete access for cast application. Traction is applied with a halter traction device (ie, chin/occipital strap) and a series of soft straps wrapped around the waist just above the iliac crests then tightened with a ratchet to improve spinal alignment. The cast application requires multiple participants.

The anesthesia care provider administers general anesthesia, monitors the patient's airway, and controls the patient's head in the traction device.

The circulating nurse assists the anesthesia care provider with anesthesia induction, helps position the patient, and documents the procedure.

The surgeon and surgical fellow or resident supervise positioning, apply traction to the hips and head, and apply casting materials to mold the torso while correction is obtained.

A cast-trained, certified nurse's aide functions as a cast technician while the cast is applied.

An additional surgical team member assists with the cast application, including assisting with manual corrective pressure if needed.

A radiology technologist takes the x-ray to confirm correction.

An orthotist prepares a mold for a brace for patients who have progressed to a braceable curve.

A combination of stockinette, cotton cast padding, felt, and casting foam are used to pad and protect bony areas and pressure points. Surgeons' preferences for the molding cast materials vary. Some surgeons prefer plaster because they believe that plaster achieves a better mold and correction, although plaster takes longer to dry. Other surgeons prefer rapid-dry, stretchable fiberglass, which also is used for orthotic molds.

When the surgeon has applied the base layer, he or she obtains correction with a combination of traction and manual pressure. When the base layer has hardened, the radiology technologist takes an anterior-posterior radiograph of the spine to assess correction. After the surgeon has reviewed the radiograph, he or she completes the cast application. The surgeon then applies a final layer of colored fiberglass; the patient and/or family members are allowed to select the color before the procedure. The surgeon uses a cast saw to trim the cast to allow full movement of arms and legs, and creates an abdominal hole for abdominal expansion (Figure 10). For patients with more involved comorbidities, care is taken to allow access to gastric tubes or other abdominal stomas. The surgeon then performs a neurological assessment of the patient during recovery from anesthesia when the patient is able to respond to verbal commands. The nurse finishes the cast before the patient is discharged, making sure to pad any potential problem areas with moleskin. The cast is changed every eight to 12 weeks until the child is eligible for a brace or has a surgical intervention.

Back to Article Outline

Halo Traction 

Patients with severe, inflexible curves sometimes require more extensive measures to improve spinal alignment. Halo traction uses the patient's own body weight to achieve some correction of rigid curves. Counterweights attached to the halo are used to provide additional traction force.2, 22 The goal is to decrease the curvature in preparation for other interventions such as a cast application or instrumentation with a growing rod or vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR™).

An open-back halo ring is placed on the patient under general anesthesia. Halo size is determined by the circumference of the patient's head measured 1 cm above the eyebrows and ears. When the patient's head circumference is in the upper limits of a halo ring size, the large ring size is used.23

The surgeon may place temporary non-penetrating pins to position the halo before inserting the skull pins. The surgeon may inject a local anesthetic with epinephrine after the circulating nurse preps the patient's skin with povidone-iodine paint. The surgeon positions the skull pins on or below the equator of the skull in a balanced manner to maximize fixation, using four to eight pins based on the size of the patient and anticipated traction force. More pins are used in small children to help distribute the load because their bones are thinner. Usually only four skull pins are needed for patients older than age eight. The surgeon finger-tightens the sterile pins until they advance through the skin, after which the surgeon advances the pins with a torque-limiting screwdriver through the outer table of the skull. The surgeon takes care to ensure that the skin is not under tension. The surgeon then tightens locking nuts on the ring, taking care not to advance the skull pins. A traction bar attached to the halo is used with a series of ropes, pulleys, and weights to maximize traction therapy. The circulating nurse applies an antibiotic or povidone-iodine ointment to the pin sites. After the patient emerges from anesthesia, the postoperative nurse performs regular neurological checks for cranial nerve function to monitor the patient for any changes or deficits.

The patient sleeps in a circle electric bed (Figure 11) with the head of the bed elevated and weights applied for the duration of their traction treatment. As time progresses, the weight amount is increased as the surgeon deems necessary. The child usually remains in traction for four to eight weeks. Circle electric beds are considered antiquated and are difficult to obtain. Shriners Hospital, Portland, has two circle-electric beds but has been unable to obtain more, so patients frequently have to wait for a bed to become available.

Members of the physical therapy department at Shriners Hospital, Portland, have been extremely creative in developing modified wheelchairs, walking frames, tricycles, and suspension frames for shower stalls that allow the patients some degree of mobility while continuing traction therapy (Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14). Regular radiographs are taken to monitor spinal correction in traction. The degree of correction obtained can speed up or delay the impending surgical procedure.

Back to Article Outline

Standards of Care Applied to all Surgical Patients 

When nonsurgical interventions fail, some patients require a surgical procedure to limit progression of their spinal deformity. With infantile and juvenile scoliosis, the challenge for spine surgeons is to stop the progression of the curve without limiting future growth of the spine. Shriners Hospitals are dedicated to helping children maximize their capabilities and live happy, healthy, productive lives. This dedication includes an adherence to the National Patient Safety Goals established by the Joint Commission. All patients undergoing surgical procedures at Shriners Hospital, Portland, receive the following standards of care.

Preoperative phase 

Before the patient arrives in the preoperative area, the preoperative nurse reviews the patient's electronic medical record verifying allergies and reviewing medications and the history and physical examination. When the patient arrives in the preoperative area, the nurse greets the patient and his or her family members and asks them to verify the patient's name and date of birth as they appear on the patient's wristband and surgical consent. The nurse confirms the patient's NPO status, allergies, the presence of a weight-based emergency medication form, and the medication administration record from the Reconciliation of Medications Across the Continuum form. The nurse takes the child's developmental age into consideration and offers age-appropriate options of care whenever possible. For instance, the nurse gives every child a toy to accompany him or her to surgery, and if a cast is to be applied, the nurse asks the child or parent to select a color for the cast. The preoperative nurse verifies that all consents needed for the procedure (eg, blood administration consent, vendor consent, surgical consent, interhospital transfer consent to the pediatric intensive care unit [PICU] at the adjacent university hospital) are present and complete. If the surgical consent has not been completed before the patient's arrival, the nurse contacts the attending surgeon. After completing all required informed consents, the surgeon and the patient or a family member perform the surgical site marking, ensuring that the surgeon's initials will be visible after prepping and draping. The nurse then completes the secondary preoperative checklist, which was initiated by the inpatient care nurse, and completes a report for the circulating nurse. The preoperative nurse then takes time to address the patient's and family members' questions and concerns.

The circulating nurse arrives in the preoperative area to assess the patient. After introducing herself or himself to the patient and family members, the nurse reviews the patient's medical record (eg, history and physical assessment, laboratory results, informed consents, preoperative checklist). The nurse then assesses the patient (eg, musculoskeletal needs, NPO status) and describes the surgical phase. After answering any questions that the patient or family members have, the nurse reassures the family that they will be provided with updates throughout the surgical procedure.

The preoperative nurse then gives the circulating nurse a verbal hand-off report and the circulating nurse develops a patient-specific care plan to fit the patient's needs and reflect interventions necessitated by the procedure being performed (Table 6). After the anesthesia care provider performs a brief preoperative reassessment, the circulating nurse and anesthesia care provider transport the patient to the OR. The preoperative nurse may accompany the patient to the OR and assist as a second circulator to start the surgical procedure.

Table 6. Nursing Care Plan for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Surgery for Scoliosis
DiagnosisNursing interventionsOutcome indicatorOutcome statement
Risk for injury and ineffective therapeutic regimen management
Develops individualized plan of care.

Obtains consultation from appropriate health care providers to initiate new treatments or changes existing treatments.

Uses clinical pathway.

Ensures continuity of care.

Acts as a patient advocate by protecting the patient from incompetent, unethical, or illegal practices.

Provides care without prejudicial behavior.

Provides care respecting worth and dignity regardless of diagnosis, disease process, procedure, or projected outcome.

Shares patient information only with those directly involved in care.

The patient or family members report that individual choices were honored before and after surgery.

The patient's actual procedure is consistent with the signed consent form.

The patient or family members voice satisfaction with delivered care.

The patient's care is consistent with the individualized perioperative plan of care.

The patient is the recipient of competent and ethical care within legal standards of practice.

Compromised family coping related to deficient knowledge and anxiety
Determines knowledge level, identifies psychosocial status, identifies barriers to communication, and notes sensory impairment.

Assesses readiness to learn and coping mechanisms.

Elicits perceptions of surgery.

Explains the expected sequence of events at an age or developmentally appropriate level.

Implements measures to provide psychological support.

Includes the patient and family members in preoperative teaching and discharge planning at an age or developmentally appropriate level and provides time for the patient and family members to ask questions.

Provides status reports to family members.

Evaluates response to instructions regarding
medications and the medication schedule,

wound care,

activity limitations,

follow-up appointments, and

signs and symptoms that may indicate surgical complications.


Evaluates family members' psychosocial response to the plan of care.

The patient or family members verbalize understanding of the procedure, sequence of events, and expected outcomes; demonstrate knowledge of emotional responses to surgery and the disease process; and verbalize decreased anxiety and an ability to cope throughout the perioperative period.

The parents and infant demonstrate appropriate bonding.

The patient or family members demonstrate knowledge of the expected responses to the operative or invasive procedure.

The patient or family members participate in decisions affecting the patient's perioperative plan of care.

Risk for peripheral neurovascular dysfunction and perioperative positioning injury
Identifies physiological status.

Assesses baseline neurological status.

Implements protective measures during neurosurgical procedures by noting sensory impairments via
somatosensory-evoked potentials and motor-evoked potentials to monitor spinal cord function of the patient during the procedure and

postoperative neurological checks.


Evaluates postoperative neurological status.

Identifies physical alterations that require additional precautions for procedure-specific positioning.

Verifies the presence of prosthetics or corrective devices.

Positions the patient.

Evaluates for signs and symptoms of injury as a result of positioning.

The patient's pressure points demonstrate hyperemia for less than 30 minutes.

The patient's sensory responses are within expected ranges at discharge from the OR.

The patient flexes and extends all extremities at discharge from the OR.

The patient's neurological status is consistent with or improved from baseline levels established preoperatively.

The patient is free from signs and symptoms of injury related to positioning.

Ineffective breathing pattern and impaired gas exchange
Monitors changes in respiratory status.

Uses monitoring equipment to assess respiratory status.

Recognizes and reports deviation in arterial blood gas studies.

Evaluates postoperative respiratory status.

The patient's arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory rate are within the expected range at discharge from the postoperative unit.The patient's respiratory function is consistent with or improved from baseline levels established preoperatively.
Hypothermia
Assesses risk for inadvertent hypothermia.

Monitors body temperature by measuring core body temperature with the appropriate method (eg, tympanic, distal esophagus, nasopharynx, pulmonary artery).

Implements thermoregulation measures by
preheating the preoperative holding area, OR, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) to 26° C (78.8° F);

minimizing skin exposure with passive insulation by placing a stocking cap on the child's head;

using active skin-surface warming methods (eg, forced-air warming,) preoperatively and contin uing their use in the PACU as needed;

warming IV and irrigation solutions to near 37° C (98.6° F) with appropriate warming equipment according to manufacturers' instructions; and

assisting the anesthesia care provider to humidify and warm the child's airway.


Evaluates response to thermoregulation measures.

The patient's temperature is greater than 36° C (96.8° F) at the time of discharge from the OR.The patient is at or returning to normothermia at the conclusion of the immediate postoperative period.

The attending surgeon, fellow, or resident is responsible for obtaining and verifying the patient's x-rays and verifying that implants and equipment needed for the procedure have been communicated to the surgical team. The circulating nurse ensures that these are available for the procedure.

Intraoperative phase 

On arrival in the OR, the circulating nurse assists the anesthesia care provider in placing all routine monitoring equipment, after which the anesthesia care provider administers a general anesthetic. The circulating nurse remains with the patient through the induction. Children are given a choice in selecting their method of care whenever possible within the constraints of patient safety. Some patients have an IV catheter inserted in the preoperative area with their family members present; others elect to have a mask induction with the IV placed after they are asleep.

When the anesthesia care provider has indicated that the patient is ready to be positioned, the attending surgeon supervises the positioning of the patient. The surgical team then performs an initial time out while the patient is still visually identifiable, verifying correct patient, correct position, correct procedure, x-rays, antibiotic administration, and availability of equipment and implants. A final safety time out is performed when the patient is prepped and draped just before the scrub person passes the scalpel to the surgeon. The circulating nurse records the time out in the patient's electronic perioperative record.

Back to Article Outline

Instrumentation of the Posterior Spine with Growing Rods 

When scoliosis cannot be controlled by serial casts or braces, growing rods can be used to maintain spine length until a definitive correction can be performed when the patient nears skeletal maturity. The purpose of the growing rod procedure is to allow for continued, controlled growth of the spine.24, 25 Growing rods are manufactured by several companies; the type used is based primarily on the surgeon's choice. One commonality of the systems used is the availability of pediatric pedicle screws and hooks.

The OR is prepared as for a posterior spinal fusion. After general anesthesia is induced, the electroneurology technologist places the neurological leads for somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) to monitor the patient's spinal cord function during the procedure. The circulating nurse inserts a latex-free, temperature-monitoring, indwelling urinary catheter. When all lines and monitors are secured, surgical team members position the patient in the prone position on a special spine table. The spine table allows modifications based on the patient's size with interchangeable chest, hip, and thigh pads. The table also adapts for either solid leg support or a sling support that allows versatility for positioning patients with contractures or deformities. Smaller patients may be placed in the prone position on a radiolucent table with chest rolls and gel pad support of the extremities. The patient's arms are placed in the prone flexed position unless the patient has physical limitations.

The anesthesia care provider uses size-appropriate, prone face pillows with endotracheal tube access to support the patient's head and neck, taking care to prevent ocular pressure. The circulating nurse ensures that all of the patient's bony prominences are well padded. The nurse then preps the patient's skin, after which the surgeon and scrub person drape the patient in the usual sterile fashion. Usually, the circulating nurse and scrub person set up an autotransfusion device. The circulating nurse measures blood loss during the surgery and, if needed, processes the collected red blood cells so the anesthesia care provider can return them to the patient. Fluoroscopy may be used to confirm the desired levels of fixation.

The surgeon makes a midline incision down to the superficial fascia. He or she splits the fascial layer distally and proximally at the desired fixation levels, with the fascia remaining intact over the mid-portion so the rods will be placed on top of the intact fascia. The surgeon performs a subperiosteal dissection along both sides of the spinous process and out over the lamina to the pedicles of the spine. Usually, the surgeon inserts four multi-axial pedicle screws into the desired two distal vertebrae. For the proximal portion of the construct, the surgeon strips the posterior aspects of the vertebrae and uses hooks (eg, pedicle, transverse process, sublaminar) for proximal fixation. The surgeon cuts the titanium rods with extra length distally for future lengthenings and may contour the rods to give some correction and to reconstruct the sagittal plane contour. The surgeon connects the rods to the screw and hook construct. The surgeon can then compress or distract the hooks and pedicle screws to obtain correction of the scoliosis.

Serial Casting and Halo Traction
Case Study

Jacob was diagnosed by his primary care physician with idiopathic infantile scoliosis and plagiocephaly (ie, asymmetric craniostenosis), a positional skull deformity, at seven months of age. The physician referred Jacob to Shriners Hospital, Portland, Oregon, for treatment of the scoliosis. Jacob presented for his initial clinic appointment at the age of nine months with a left thoracic curve of 45 degrees from T9 to L1. A thoracic lumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO) brace was fitted to be worn 23 hours per day.

At his next clinic visit six months later, an x-ray with the brace on showed a reduction of the curve to 38 degrees. No segmentation anomalies were noted. Brace compliance was a problem, however. Jacob's father reported that the brace was being worn only at night. He stated that it was very difficult to place his son in the brace and that Jacob often cried himself to sleep. The father was instructed to continue his son's brace wear, gradually increasing the time Jacob spent in the brace to improve his tolerance.

During the next two years, Jacob had regularly scheduled clinic visits for physical examination and x-rays. His brace was refashioned several times, and one replacement was necessary. He was now an active three-year-old, tolerating the brace well, and the family was satisfied that he was progressing. Jacob had moderately flexible scoliosis with no neurological deficits, but the spinal curvature was large and complicated by a significant rotational deformity. Jacob's x-rays indicated that his curve had worsened, with progression of the curve to 88 degrees out of the brace and 50 degrees in the brace. This warranted further discussion with the family regarding surgical intervention, most likely using halo traction and either a cast or a growing rod. Jacob was fitted with a new brace in hopes that surgery could be delayed as long as possible to allow for skeletal growth.

By age four, Jacob's curve had progressed to 64 degrees in the brace and six months later, he had a halo traction device applied. He was placed in a circle-electric bed with 7 lbs of traction. The following day, he was taken out of the bed and placed in a traction-adapted wheelchair. The nurses performed neurovascular checks for cranial nerve function on a routine basis and noted no deficits. Jacob's x-ray in halo traction demonstrated a curve of 58 degrees. During the next four weeks, the traction weight was gradually increased to 18 lbs. His curve decreased to 40 degrees, the halo was removed and a cast was applied. Postoperative x-rays demonstrated that the correction was maintained in the cast, and he was discharged without incident. The correction of Jacob's curve with serial casting was sufficient to permit a return to TLSO bracing. This failed, however, so serial casting every three months was resumed.

Today, at age six, Jacob remains active with age-appropriate activities. He is quite tolerant of his cast, and it is presently holding his curve at 41 degrees. The plan is to continue casting until Jacob nears skeletal maturity, at which time he will undergo a posterior, spinal-instrumented fusion. It is possible that an anterior spinal release may be indicated to obtain correction of Jacob's spinal deformity.

Halo Traction and Instrumentation with Growing Rod
Case Study

Judith was initially diagnosed with infantile scoliosis at 10 months of age while living with her parents overseas. She presented to Shriners Hospital for Children, Portland, Oregon, as a 16-month-old infant. Judith had met all developmental milestones but had chronic constipation and urinary retention. The thoracolumbar curve measured by x-ray was 48 degrees. Judith's physician ordered a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of Judith's spinal cord to evaluate for gastrointestinal and genitourinary abnormalities and prescribed a thoracic lumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO). The initial bracing reduced the curve to 26 degrees, and the family was instructed to increase brace wear to 22 hours per day.

Three months later, after Judith had experienced a large growth spurt, the curve was 36 degrees in the brace and the brace was ill-fitting; therefore, it was replaced. The MRI results showed a large sacral arachnoid cyst and possibly a tethered spinal cord. Judith's physician referred the family to a pediatric neurosurgeon and urologist for further evaluation and treatment.

The urologist noted neurogenic bladder symptoms and deferred to the neurosurgeon, who removed the sacral cyst and detethered the spinal cord just before Judith's second birthday. Her symptoms were relieved and she recovered without incident. At age two-and-a-half, she returned to Shriners Hospital. Her curve was 41 degrees out of the brace. The TLSO was replaced and the curve reduced to 26 degrees. During the next two-and-a-half years, Judith had courses of treatment with either casting or wearing a TLSO brace. These treatments were satisfactory until she began to experience significant nutritional problems. Her mother reported that when Judith was in the TLSO, she refused to eat. Compliance with brace wear had decreased to between six and eight hours per day. Judith was very thin despite a reported high-calorie diet and daily supplements with a pediatric liquid nutritional supplement formula. She weighed 18 kg (25th to 50th percentile), gaining less than 1 kg during the previous two years. She was 119 cm tall (97th percentile), a 5-cm increase in two years. Out of the brace, her spinal curve was 57 degrees. The TLSO was discontinued and Judith was placed on the waiting list for four weeks of halo traction therapy, followed by instrumentation with a posterior spine growing rod. During the next few months, Judith's mother worked closely with the pediatrician to improve Judith's nutritional status. Out of the brace, Judith's desire to eat improved almost immediately and her weight increased to 19.55 kg (50th to 75th percentile).

Judith underwent surgical placement of halo traction. The traction weight was increased 1 lb per day until it reached the desired goal of half of her body weight. She tolerated the traction extremely well. A wheelchair, walker, and a tricycle adapted by her physical therapist permitted Judith to participate in age-appropriate activities while remaining in traction.

Four weeks later, the halo traction device was removed and growing rods were inserted. The construct was a standard configuration of four distal pedicle screws, four proximal hooks, and two expandable rods. The rods were tunneled so a midline incision was unnecessary, resulting in two small incisions for placement of the hooks and screws. The surgery was uneventful. The rods will be lengthened every six months until Judith is closer to skeletal maturity. Then she will undergo a posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation.

After correction is achieved, the surgeon tightens all components using a torque-limiting screwdriver. The surgeon may place one or more cross-links between the rods for additional stability. The surgeon may use fluoroscopy throughout the procedure to evaluate implant placement, especially during pedicle screw insertion. The surgeon obtains autograft bone using a high speed burr or Capner gouge. This autograft bone provides a fusion mass to supplement decortication of the screw and hook fixation sites. If indicated, the surgeon may supplement with allograft. The surgeon copiously irrigates the wound with normal saline and then closes the surgical incisions. The radiology technologist takes an x-ray after the procedure is complete to assess correction and verify the location of the implants.

Before discharge, the team fits the patient for a non-corrective orthosis for stability until bone fusion is achieved at the implant sites. The patient wears the orthosis for three months or until bone fusion is demonstrated. Some patients continue to use soft braces for sports or day braces to help maintain correction.

Lengthening of the growing rod, which is a much simpler procedure, usually is performed every six months as the patient continues to grow. The surgeon makes small incisions over the distraction lock sites. The surgeon loosens the lock and uses a distractor to obtain the desired increase in length of both rods. The procedure is performed under fluoroscopy and a postoperative x-ray is taken to assess correction.

Back to Article Outline

VEPTR Implants 

Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib implants are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to mechanically stabilize and expand the thorax in skeletally immature patients with thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS).6, 24 Thoracic insufficiency syndrome describes the inability of the thorax to support lung growth or normal pulmonary function.26, 27 Thoracic insufficiency syndrome may occur in patients with congenital and noncongenital spine deformities (Figure 15).

  • View full-size image.
  • Figure 15. 

    Congenital scoliosis demonstrating fusion from the thoracolumbar junction to the sacrum. Thoracic insufficiency syndrome is related to abdominal crowding/displacement.

Congenital cases involve children with spinal or chest wall deformities that limit the growth of the chest wall or spine severely enough to impair pulmonary function.26 When rib fusions or a spinal deformity limit chest wall growth, the lungs fail to develop. Breathing is compromised by decreased lung capacity and rigidity of the chest wall. This process is progressive, and if left untreated, may even result in death. In cases of neuromuscular scoliosis, breathing is compromised by the inability of the chest wall muscles to support respiratory effort. The VEPTR device in these children may prevent collapse of the thorax as the spinal curve increases.

There are contraindications, however, to the use of the VEPTR. The device is contraindicated in patients who

are younger than six months of age,

are beyond the age of skeletal maturity,

have absent diaphragmatic function,

have inadequate bone strength of the ribs or spine to support attachment of the device,

do not have proximal and distal ribs to which the device can be attached,

lack adequate soft tissue coverage for the device,

have an infection at the surgical site, or

have a known allergy to any of the device materials.28

The goals of treatment with the VEPTR device are to increase thoracic volume, obtain thoracic symmetry, and improve thoracic function. The long-term goal is to maintain these improvements throughout the patient's growth phases while maintaining spinal alignment and allowing spinal growth. At Shriners Hospital, Portland, the VEPTR surgery is performed primarily

as a thoracic expansion thoracoplasty for fused ribs in patients with chest wall deformities,

to stabilize patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, or

as a modified growing rod construct for infantile and juvenile scoliosis.

Expansion surgery is performed every six months. This requires a less invasive surgical procedure with two small incisions over the distraction clip sites. The distraction clip is removed, the device is expanded, and a new clip is placed. Revisions of the construct may be necessary as the child grows, but revisions usually are timed with scheduled expansions.

A variety of VEPTR-based expansion thoracoplasty techniques can be used to increase chest volume and allow for growth of the lungs while indirectly correcting the scoliosis without fusing the spine. Construct options include

hybrid rib-to-spine using a combination of pediatric spine implants with VEPTR implants (ie, rib hook to spine pedicle or iliac screws);

rib-to-lumbar lamina (ie, rib hooks to a lamina hook);

rib-to-pelvis (ie, rib hook to an “S-rod” that bridges the ilium); and

rib-to-rib (ie, rib hook to rib hook).

Procedure description 

The VEPTR-based expansion thoracoplasty procedure is performed under general anesthesia. Some patients undergoing VEPTR procedures require fiber optic intubation because of difficult airway management issues related to the syndromes treated with the VEPTR procedure. After general anesthesia is induced, the electroneurology technologist places the electrodes for SSEPs and MEPs for spinal cord monitoring. The surgical team positions the patient in the prone position with rolls placed transversely under the upper chest and pelvis on a radiolucent OR bed, taking care to keep the patient's abdomen free. The circulating nurse preps the patient's skin, after which the surgeon and scrub person drape the surgical site in standard sterile fashion. The circulating nurse and scrub person set up an autotransfusion device, and if needed, the circulating nurse processes the collected red blood cells and the anesthesia care provider returns them to the patient.

Hybrid rib-to-spine and rib-to-lumbar lamina VEPTR construct 

The surgical approach to these two procedures is similar. The surgeon makes two small incisions overlying the indicated spinous processes using fluoroscopy for guidance. The surgeon makes the first incision at the lumbar site to the laminar pedicles. He or she then inserts screws into the pedicles or hooks around the pedicles, then verifies the position with fluoroscopy. The surgeon makes the second incision over the desired rib-fixation point down to the fascia. The surgeon undermines the fat layer so that the fascial incision can be made in a plane, distinct from that of the skin incision to allow better coverage of the implants. Typically, the surgeon identifies the third and fourth ribs on the affected side and places two VEPTR cradles over the ribs (Figure 16).

The surgeon inspects the chest for a pneumothorax and, if needed, places a chest tube, which the circulating nurse and scrub person connect to a water-seal drainage reservoir. The length of the proximal and distal extension devices takes into consideration the need for future expansion procedures. The surgeon contours the lower portion as needed and cuts the extension rods to the appropriate length. The surgeon passes the rod through a tunnel created under the muscle and subcutaneous tissues using a 20-Fr chest tube. The surgeon then connects the rod to the rib-cradle construct and then to the pedicle screws.

Distraction is then carried out. For bilateral cases, the surgeon duplicates the procedure on the opposite side of the spine. After the rod is distracted and correction is obtained, the surgeon performs the final tightening. The surgeon secures the extension rods with a distraction lock and may use transverse bars, extensions, and connectors to allow variations of attachment options. The surgeon applies a bone graft to the lumbar portion of the construct to promote bone fusion.

Rib-to-pelvis VEPTR construct 

If the VEPTR construct is rib-to-pelvis, the surgeon makes an incision over the iliac crest with an additional incision in the iliac crest apophysis. The surgeon widens the incision with a Freer elevator and a 90-degree pelvic hook from the VEPTR set. A rib-pelvis hybrid extension device is chosen that allows for future expansions. The surgeon contours the lower portion into lordosis and cuts the device to the appropriate length. The surgeon uses vaginal packing forceps to tunnel under the muscle and subcutaneous tissues from the superior wound to the lower wound. The surgeon then puts a 20-Fr chest tube into the proximal portion of the wound, passes the VEPTR extension subcutaneously, and secures the extension from the pelvic hook to the rib cradle using a variety of connection options. Distraction is then carried out. If the procedure is to be done bilaterally, the surgeon performs the same steps on the opposite side (Figure 17). When distraction and correction have been achieved, the surgeon performs the final tightening.

Rib-to-rib VEPTR construct 

A rib-to-rib construct allows for attachment from the superior rib to the inferior ribs using opposing rib cradles (Figure 18). The surgeon takes special care to examine the pleura for tears, and if needed, places a chest tube, which is connected to a water-seal drainage reservoir.

After irrigation and wound closure, the surgeon injects local anesthetic along the wound edges to assist with postoperative pain control. The surgeon and scrub person apply sterile dressings in a protective double layer and place compressive bandages on the incisions. The radiology technologist takes a postoperative anterior-posterior chest x-ray to assess the construct and evaluate for pneumothorax. Patients undergoing primary VEPTR with chest wall expansion are transferred to the PICU. Patients undergoing revisions are transferred to the standard postanesthesia care unit (PACU).

Back to Article Outline

Other Types of Surgical Interventions for Correction of Infantile and Juvenile Scoliosis 

Four other surgical techniques (ie, in-situ fusion, hemi-epiphysiodesis, hemivertebral resection, multiple level anterior and/or posterior spinal fusions) also may be used for this age group. Complications may be associated with these procedures in young children, however, because growth of the spine may result in curve progression or rotational deformities.11, 24

In-situ fusion 

In-situ fusion, meaning fused “where it is,” may be performed via an anterior or a posterior approach. This involves a limited correction of the curve and is performed to prevent further serious deformity of the spine.11, 24 This technique is used almost exclusively for short segment, congenital deformities.

Hemi-epiphysiodesis 

Hemi-epiphysiodesis is performed to limit growth on one side of the spine while allowing corrective growth on the other side.11, 24 Although past reports of the use of this technique have been disappointing, there has been a recent resurgence using staples in the anterior spine as a substitute for bracing in juvenile and adolescent scoliosis.

Hemivertebral resection 

Hemivertebral resection is performed in cases of congenital vertebral deformity. The approach may be anterior via a lateral thoracotomy approach, posterior, or combination anterior/posterior procedure. When the hemivertebra is removed, the vertebrae proximal and distal to the deformity are fused together with instrumentation. Only a short segment of the spine needs to be corrected with instrumentation (eg, two to three levels).

Multiple level anterior and/or posterior spinal fusions 

Multiple level anterior and/or posterior spinal fusions are rarely performed in cases of infantile and juvenile scoliosis. When the patient nears skeletal maturity, a definitive spinal fusion with instrumentation, autograft, or allograft will be performed. Posterior approach with instrumentation is the most common surgery performed for spinal fusion. Anterior approach with instrumentation is generally used for single thoracic or single lumbar curves. Some patients with more rigid curves require an anterior release followed by a posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation.11, 24 In cases in which a posterior fusion must be performed when the patient is still expected to grow significantly, anterior release and fusion to promote anterior growth arrest may be indicated to prevent twisting of the spine with later loss of correction. This problem is known as a crankshaft phenomenon.

Back to Article Outline

Postoperative Phase 

Teamwork and interactions between the OR team and the PACU nurses are crucial. The assigned PACU nurse frequently is present in the OR at the completion of the surgical procedure to assist with transferring the patient to the stretcher or postoperative bed or crib. The PACU nurse reviews the patient's electronic medical record before the procedure is completed and receives a verbal hand-off report from the circulating nurse and the anesthesia care provider with information pertinent to postoperative patient care. Family members are allowed in the PACU when the patient has emerged from the anesthetic. The PACU nurses then address any questions or concerns expressed by the patient or family members before completing the hand-off report to the receiving medical/surgical unit nurse.

If the patient is being transferred to the PICU of the university hospital, the circulating nurse gives a full telephonic report to the receiving PICU nurse. The transport team, which includes the anesthesia care provider, two certified pediatric advance life support RNs, the surgical fellow or resident, and a certified nurse's aide, is fully briefed by the anesthesia care provider and circulating nurse. If the circulating nurse does not accompany the patient during transport, the pediatric RNs give a copy of the circulating nurse's report to the PICU RN to answer any questions that arise. On arrival in the PICU, the anesthesia care provider, transport RN, and surgical resident or fellow give a full patient care hand-off report to the PICU physician and PICU RN.

When stable, the patient returns from the PICU to the Shriners Hospital, Portland, Oregon, inpatient nursing unit. The PICU nurse gives a hand-off report to the inpatient nurses including all the information pertaining to the patient's postoperative intensive care course. The receiving nurse performs a nursing assessment and a member of the medical staff performs a readmission history and physical examination and completes a progress note. The patient remains on the inpatient unit until he or she meets discharge criteria.

Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR™) Implant
Case Study

James was diagnosed with spinal curvature at six months of age and was treated with bracing at one year of age. A Milwaukee-type back brace was used for the first several years, but treatment was compromised by noncompliance. James presented at Shriners Hospital, Portland, Oregon, at five years of age with a diagnosis of congenital scoliosis. Physical examination showed an active five-year-old with what appeared to be a relatively flexible spine. The initial clinical evaluation revealed a hemivertebra and boney bars throughout the thoracic spine. Radiographs showed a 75-degree levoscoliosis from T2 to L3 with a 95-degree compensatory curve and a kyphosis of 47 degrees. The physician obtained x-rays under manual traction to assess for flexibility and likelihood of response to bracing. With manual traction, the curves reduced to 54 degrees and 35 degrees. The patient's ill-fitting brace was replaced with a Milwaukee brace, to be worn for 23 hours per day.

James was compliant with the brace instructions and demonstrated noticeable improvement at his first follow-up clinic visit. His x-rays showed a decrease in the curve to 59 degrees in the new brace. James was followed regularly as an outpatient for several months. Treatment in the brace continued with progressive tightening and minor adjustments. This was tolerated well, although the brace resulted in self-restricted activity. According to his family, James was unable to keep up with his peers. With physical and occupational therapy, James' motor skills and capacity for activities of daily living improved, and he began to participate in swimming and bicycle riding. His curve remained stable in the brace at 54 and 46 degrees. Further evaluation included a magnetic resonance imaging scan to assess the spinal anomalies and a computed tomography (CT) scan for lung volume. The CT scan revealed the absence of a rib at T10, rib fusions of T1 to T5 with a significant reduction in chest volume, boney bars from T1 to T4, and a hemivertebra in the upper thoracic spine.

The physician proposed a treatment plan to the patient's family that included the possibility of a VEPTR procedure, an intervention that had not yet been performed at Shriners Hospital, Portland. The physician ordered pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and referred the patient to a pediatric pulmonologist. The patient's lung volumes were 202 mL on the right and 220 mL on the left, although normal lung capacity for someone of James' age and size should have been 500 mL. Six months later, based on the results of the pulmonary consult and CT scan, James was officially diagnosed with thoracic insufficiency syndrome. The physician again discussed the potential for a VEPTR to treat James' condition. Continuation of treatment with bracing was predicted to be ineffective; therefore, the parents decided to have James placed on the surgical waiting list for a VEPTR procedure pending institutional review board (IRB) approval.

Three months later, after the surgeon received IRB approval to perform the VEPTR surgery, James underwent an opening wedge thoracotomy with instrumentation using the rib-to-rib and hybrid rib-to-spine VEPTR devices to permit expansion and growth of the hemithorax and to control his spinal deformity. Immediately after surgery, an x-ray showed the primary curve was reduced to 53 degrees. The hospitalization was uneventful and James was discharged after five days. James was evaluated in the spine clinic two, five, and 12 weeks after surgery. He recovered well, with minimal pain, full range of motion of extremities, and full participation in peer activities. Because of James' increased activity level, the surgeon cautioned the family to minimize activities that could increase James' risk of falls. It was noted that James' appetite increased and his breathing was less labored after the VEPTR procedure. Follow-up x-rays confirmed the VEPTR devices to be intact and showed a stable curve of 53 degrees.

Six months after initial placement, the VEPTR devices were surgically expanded. The curve was then 58 degrees. In follow-up clinic appointments, James did very well but reported gradual “stiffening” sensations in his back. This was thought to be caused by rapid growth, so he was scheduled for replacement of the VEPTR construct or expansion of the existing device.

Replacement of the titanium ribs was performed when James was nine years old and resulted in a 50-degree curve. James' surgery and recovery were again uneventful. Three months after surgery, the family requested a protective brace because James was now extremely active and had an area of hardware prominence over the ribs.

The VEPTR was expanded again six months later and recovery was uneventful. Several months later, PFTs and a chest CT scan were repeated. These demonstrated a stable curve of 56 degrees, intact implants, and unchanged alignment. James' lung volumes had increased to 558 mL on the right and 667 mL on the left, an increase of nearly 300% in four years.

Two more expansions were performed during the next year. At age 11, after significant physical growth, James' chest CT scan and PFTs were repeated. James' right and left lung volumes had decreased to 414 mL and 463 mL, respectively. An expansion of the VEPTR device was recently performed. The definitive plan is to perform a spinal correction and fusion when the patient is closer to skeletal maturity.

Back to Article Outline

Conclusion 

Early onset scoliosis is a complex problem requiring a dedicated treatment approach on a long and potentially “crooked” path. Nonsurgical treatments such as orthosis or casting require patient and family compliance, with ongoing modifications and/or replacements as the child grows. Surgical treatment with halo application results in weeks and possibly months of hospitalization for traction therapy. After initial instrumentation with growing rod or VEPTR implants, surgical procedures are required every six months to lengthen the rods. Revisions and/or replacement of instrumentation may be needed as the child grows and because of metal fatigue, resulting in implant breakage or displacement.

The child's caregivers bear a great deal of responsibility for the care and treatment of a child with early onset scoliosis, but the multidisciplinary medical and surgical team provides invaluable support to the family. It would be an arduous task without a concentrated effort of physicians, nurses, orthotists, therapists, and numerous other ancillary staff members sharing the responsibility. Interventions begin from the time the child is diagnosed with idiopathic, congenital, neuromuscular, or syndrome-related scoliosis. This is an ongoing process until the child's scoliosis resolves or, more likely, he or she has reached the age where corrective spinal fusion with instrumentation can be performed. These children are committed to a regimen that may encompass their entire childhood.

Scoliosis
Patient Education

Back to Article Outline

What is scoliosis? 

Scoliosis is an abnormal curve in your child's spine. It may be classified according to when it occurs:

birth to two years of age is called infantile,

three to nine years of age is called juvenile,

10 to 17 years of age is called adolescent, and

18 and older is called adult.

Scoliosis also may be classified according to the cause or type, such as

idiopathic: no known cause;

neuromuscular: lack of normal musculature due to a medical condition; or

congenital: birth defect or structural abnormality.

Back to Article Outline

What are some problems caused by scoliosis? 

As the spine curves, the rib cage and lung may become distorted. This limits the ability of the lungs to grow, which may in turn cause problems with breathing. Scoliosis can also cause problems such as chronic constipation, urinary retention, and back pain. Some of the treatments for scoliosis can cause skin problems.

Back to Article Outline

What are the risk factors for developing scoliosis? 

Mothers of children with diseases may wonder if they did anything while they were pregnant that caused the condition, but often, the reason the child has this abnormality is not known. Certain medical conditions that affect the joints and muscles increase the risk of your child having scoliosis, such as cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, polio, rheumatoid arthritis, and spina bifida. Your child is more likely to have scoliosis if other members of your family do.

Back to Article Outline

How is scoliosis diagnosed? 

Scoliosis is diagnosed when a health care provider examines your child and notices an abnormal curve of the spine. The nature and magnitude of the curve is confirmed by x-ray; the health care provider may then order further tests, such magnetic resonance imaging scans or computed tomography scans.

Back to Article Outline

What are the treatment options for scoliosis? 

There are a variety of options available to treat your child's scoliosis depending on the cause or severity of the spinal curvature. You and your child's doctor may decide initially that the best course of action is to observe your child to see if the curvature worsens. Your child may be prescribed a specially made body brace, body casts, or traction. Your child's doctor may recommend that your child undergo surgery during which implants are used to permanently fix your child's spinal curves.

Back to Article Outline

What is the postoperative care for scoliosis surgery 

After surgery, your child's health care providers will help your child have as little pain as possible. They will take care of your child's incisions to help prevent a wound infection. Your child may have an IV tube in a vein to give fluids and medications. The health care providers will also work with your child to make sure he or she breathes deeply and does not get a lung infection. The health care providers will gradually help your child start moving, which helps prevent problems with the other muscles and bones and helps prevent constipation.

Back to Article Outline

What happens after you take your child home? 

Your child's health care providers will teach you how to care for your child's incision and how to help decrease pain after surgery. It is very important for your child to eat a healthy diet and stay active while maintaining activity restrictions after surgery to help the bones and incisions heal better.

Back to Article Outline

Call your physician immediately if your child experiences any of these postoperative complications 

a bump near the incision, which might mean the implants have shifted;

drainage from the incision or opening of the wound;

fever; or

redness, swelling, or bleeding from the incision.

For more information on scoliosis, visit the Scoliosis Research Society at http://www.srs.org and iScoliosis at http://www.iScoliosis.com.

For children with a syndrome or neuromuscular disease, treatment for their scoliosis may be one component of a series of measures that serve to improve the quality of their lives and to a variable degree, the quantity of their years. Children with thoracic insufficiency syndrome, some of whom would not have survived without intervention, are able to grow to adulthood with increased thoracic volume and improved pulmonary function. The goal of medical and surgical care at Shriners Hospitals is to send these children to adulthood breathing easy and proudly standing or sitting tall and erect.

Back to Article Outline

Examination 

Infantile and Juvenile Scoliosis: The Crooked Path to Diagnosis and Treatment 

Purpose/Goal 

To educate perioperative nurses about caring for infants and children undergoing treatment for infantile or juvenile scoliosis.

Behavioral Objectives 

After reading and studying the article on infantile and juvenile scoliosis, nurses will be able to

1.define scoliosis,

2.discuss the classifications of scoliosis,

3.describe methods of evaluating scoliosis,

4.compare nonsurgical options for treating scoliosis,

5.identify surgical options for treating scoliosis, and

6.explain perioperative nursing interventions in the surgical treatment of scoliosis.

Questions 

1.Scoliosis is an abnormal
a.lateral and rotational curvature of the vertebral column.

b.intervertebral disc herniation and fracture of the vertebral body.

c.forward dislocation of one spinal vertebra over the one below it.


2.Structural scoliosis may be related to
1.a response to a neuromuscular disorder.

2.congenital spinal column abnormalities.

3.part of a syndrome.

4.tumors.
a.1 and 3

b.2 and 4

c.1, 2, and 3

d.1, 2, 3, and 4



3.The types of deformities that cause congenital scoliosis include
1.failure of formation defects.

2.failure of segmentation defects.

3.mixed defects.
a.1 and 2

b.1 and 3

c.2 and 3

d.1, 2, and 3



4.Evaluation of scoliosis includes
1.a detailed history and physical examination.

2.an Adams forward-bending test.

3.standing posterior-anterior and lateral x-rays of the spine.

4.supine, maximum left and right side-bending x-rays.
a.1 and 2

b.3 and 4

c.2, 3, and 4

d.1, 2, 3, and 4



5.The Cobb angle
1.measures the amount of vertebral rotation or alignment of the spine.

2.has a standard measurement error of three to five degrees.

3.is useful for measuring progression or correction of scoliosis curves.

4.should be exactly the same each time the spine is measured.

5.accounts for the degree of tilt on the endpoint vertebrae.
a.1 and 5

b.2 and 3

c.2, 3, 4, and 5

d.1, 2, 3, 4, and 5



6.A ____________ orthosis is used to treat juvenile and adolescent scoliosis or kyphosis and is intended for daytime use only.
a.low-profile

b.Boston-type

c.Milwaukee

d.Providence


7.Halo traction
1.is used for patients with severe, inflexible curves.

2.is used as a definitive treatment to cure scoliosis.

3.is used to decrease the curvature in preparation for other interventions.

4.uses counterweights attached to the halo to provide traction force.

5.uses the patient's own body weight to achieve some correction of rigid curves.
a.1 and 2

b.2, 4, and 5

c.1, 3, 4, and 5

d.1, 2, 3, 4, and 5



8.The purpose of the growing rod procedure is to allow for continued, controlled growth of the spine.
a.true

b.false


9.Nursing interventions to help patients and their family members cope with surgery include
1.eliciting their perceptions of surgery.

2.explaining the expected sequence of events.

3.providing time for questions.

4.providing status reports to family members during surgery.

5.providing preoperative teaching and discharge planning at age-appropriate levels.
a.2 and 3

b.1, 4, and 5

c.2, 3, 4 and 5

d.1, 2, 3, 4, and 5



10.Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib implants are used to mechanically stabilize and expand the thorax in skeletally-immature patients with
a.Arnold-Chiari malformation.

b.thoracic insufficiency syndrome.

c.myotonic dystrophy.

d.osteogenesis imperfecta.


Back to Article Outline

Answer Sheet 

Infantile and Juvenile Scoliosis: The Crooked Path to Diagnosis and Treatment 

Event #09305

Session #1139

Please fill out the application and answer form on this page and the evaluation form on the back of this page. Tear the page out of the Journal or make photocopies and mail with appropriate fee to:

AORN Customer Service

c/o AORN Journal Continuing Education

2170 S Parker Rd, Suite 400

Denver, CO 80231-5711

or fax with credit card information to (303) 750-3212.

Additionally, please verify by signature that you have reviewed the objectives and read the article, or you will not receive credit.

Signature ______________________________________

1.Record your AORN member identification number in the appropriate section below. (See your member card.)

2.Completely darken the spaces that indicate your answers to examination questions 1 through 10. Use blue or black ink only.

3.Our accrediting body requires that we verify the time you needed to complete this 7.2 continuing education contact hour (432-minute) program. ______

4.Enclose fee if information is mailed.

AORN (ID) # ____________________________________________

Name __________________________________________________

Address ________________________________________________

City ___________________________________________________ State __________ Zip __________

Phone number __________________________________________

RN license # ____________________________________________ State __________

Fee enclosed ___________________________________________

or bill the credit card indicated MC Visa American Express Discover

Card # ___________________________________ Expiration date _____________________

Signature _______________________________________________________________ (for credit card authorization)

Fee: Members $41 (includes $5 processing fee);

Nonmembers $77 (includes $5 processing fee)

New! Save time and money by completing this CE activity online.

No processing fees at aorn.org/CE.

Program offered September 2009; The deadline for this program is September 30, 2012.

This article is approved for 7.2 (S) Category I credits by the American Board for Certification in Orthotics, Prosthetics & Pedorthics (ABC) for the following programs: orthotists, orthotic assistants, and orthotic technicians. (cost: $72)

Check this box to receive ABC credits:

A score of 70% correct on the examination is required for credit. Participants receive feedback on incorrect answers. Each applicant who successfully completes this program will receive a certificate of completion.

Back to Article Outline

Learner Evaluation 

Infantile and Juvenile Scoliosis: The Crooked Path to Diagnosis and Treatment 

This evaluation is used to determine the extent to which this continuing education program met your learning needs. Rate these items on a scale of 1 to 5.

Purpose/Goal 

To educate perioperative nurses about caring for infants and children undergoing treatment for infantile or juvenile scoliosis.

Objectives 

To what extent were the following objectives of this continuing education program achieved?

1.Define scoliosis.

2.Discuss the classifications of scoliosis.

3.Describe methods of evaluating scoliosis.

4.Compare nonsurgical options for treating scoliosis.

5.Identify surgical options for treating scoliosis.

6.Explain perioperative nursing interventions in the surgical treatment of scoliosis.

Content 

To what extent

7.did this article increase your knowledge of the subject matter?

8.was the content clear and organized?

9.did this article facilitate learning?

10.were your individual objectives met?

11.did the objectives relate to the overall purpose/goal?

Test Questions/Answers 

To what extent

12.were they reflective of the content?

13.were they easy to understand?

14.did they address important points?

Learner Input 

15.Will you be able to use the information from this article in your work setting?
a.yes

b.no


16.I learned of this article via
a.the AORN Journal I receive as an AORN member.

b.a AORN Journal I obtained elsewhere.

c.the AORN Journal web site.


17.What factor most affects whether you take an AORN Journal continuing education examination?
a.need for continuing education contact hours

b.price

c.subject matter relevant to current position

d.number of continuing education contact hours offered


What other topics would you like to see addressed in a future continuing education article? Would you be interested or do you know someone who would be interested in writing an article on this topic?

Topic(s): _______________________________________________________________________________________

Author names and addresses: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Back to Article Outline

Acknowledgements 

The authors acknowledge and thank the Board of Directors and administrative team at Shriners Hospital, Portland, Oregon, for recognizing the importance of nursing education and the value of nursing publications. Without this emphasis on education and research, articles of this nature would not be possible. The authors also thank the following people from Shriners Hospital, Portland, Oregon: Ivan Krajbich, MD, FRCSC, pediatric orthopedic spine surgeon, and Charles d'Amato, MD, FRCSC, pediatric orthopedic spine surgeon, for providing their expertise and assistance in the writing of this article; Todd DeWees, CPO, staff orthotist, for providing the table on orthotics and answering a multitude of questions; Harlan Pine, media specialist, and Brian Demmings, photographer, from media services for the numerous supporting photographs and x-rays used to illustrate key points; Larry Jacobson, MD, chief of anesthesia, for helping improve and shorten the article with his keen editing skills; Herb Hostler, physical therapist, for modifying the tricycle, wheelchair, and walking frame illustrated in the halo traction portion of the article; and Bill Weide, network specialist from information services for technical support.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Lakshmanan P , Peehal JP , Ahuja S . Infantile scoliosis. eMedicine WebMD . http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1259899-overview Accessed July 1, 2009.
  2. D'Astous JL , Sanders JO . Casting and traction treatment methods for scoliosis . Orthop Clin North Am . 2007;38(4):477–484
  3. Spinal curves and scoliosis. September 1, 2007. Radiologic Technology . http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-7190321/Spinal-curves-and-scoliosisCE.html Accessed July 1, 2009.
  4. Lenke LG , SRS Terminology Committee and Working Group on Spinal Classification  . Revised glossary of terms. Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/professionals/glossary/glossary.php Accessed July 1, 2009.
  5. Winter RB . Spinal deformity . In: Disorders of the Pediatric Spine . New York, NY: Raven Press; 1995;p. 309–348
  6. Infantile scoliosis. Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/professionals/education/infantile/infantile.php Accessed July 1, 2009.
  7. Juvenile scoliosis: surgery instrumentation and fusion. Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/professionals/education/juvenile/operative.php Accessed July 1, 2009.
  8. Dobbs MB , Lenke LG , Szymanski DA , et al.   Prevalence of neural axis abnormalities in patients with infantile idiopathic scoliosis . J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2002;84–A(12):2230–2234
  9. King HA . Idiopathic scoliosis . In:  Herkowitz HN ,  Garfin SR ,  Eismont FJ ,  Bell GR ,  Balderston RA editor. Rothman-Simeone The Spine . 5th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2006;p. 515–534
  10. Mehta MH . Growth as a corrective force in the early treatment of progressive infantile scoliosis . J Bone Joint Surg Br . 2005;87(9):1237–1247
  11. Juvenile scoliosis. Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/professionals/education/juvenile Accessed July 1, 2009.
  12. Launay F , Sponseller PD . Congenital scoliosis . In:  Herkowitz HN ,  Garfin SR ,  Eismont FJ ,  Bell GR ,  Balderston RA editor. Rothman-Simeone The Spine . 5th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2006;p. 507–514
  13. Dobbs MB , Lenke LG . Neuromuscular scoliosis. eMedicine WebMD . http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1266097-overview Accessed July 1, 2009.
  14. Lonstein JE . Treating scoliosis in neuromuscular conditions . Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare: A Pediatric Perspective . 2002;11(3):1–3 http://www.gillettechildrens.org/fileUpload/vol11no3.pdf Accessed July 1, 2009.
  15. Neuromuscular scoliosis. Children's Hospital Boston . http://www.childrenshospital.org/az/Site2027/printerfriendlypageS2027PO.html Accessed July 1, 2009.
  16. Pashman RS . Neuromuscular scoliosis. eSpine . http://www.espine.com/scoliosis-neuromuscular.htm Accessed July 1, 2009.
  17. Infantile scoliosis observation  . Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/professionals/education/infantile/observation.php Accessed July 1, 2009.
  18. Cobb diagnostic test. iScoliosis.com. http://www.iscoliosis.com/symptoms-cobb.html. Accessed July 29, 2009.
  19. Loder RT , Spiegel D , Gutknecht S , Kleist K , Ly T , Mehbod A . The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age . Spine . 2004;29(22):2548–2553
  20. Infantile scoliosis bracing. Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/professionals/education/infantile/bracing.php Accessed July 1, 2009.
  21. Infantile scoliosis casting. Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/professionals/education/infantile/casting.php Accessed July 1, 2009.
  22. Infantile scoliosis traction. Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/professionals/education/infantile/traction.php Accessed July 1, 2009.
  23. In: PMT Instruction Manual . Chanhassen, MN: PMT Corporation; 2007;p. 3–9
  24. Infantile scoliosis surgery. Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/professionals/education/infantile/surgery.php Accessed July 1, 2009.
  25. Juvenile scoliosis: surgery growing rods. Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/professionals/education/juvenile/growingrod.php Accessed July 1, 2009.
  26. Thoracic insufficiency syndrome. Scoliosis Research Society . http://www.srs.org/patients/tis Accessed July 1, 2009.
  27. Thoracic insufficiency syndrome program. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia . http://www.chop.edu/consumer/jsp/division/generic.jsp?id=79208 Accessed July 1, 2009.
  28. In: VEPTR II Technique Guide . West Chester, PA: Synthes Spine, Inc; 2008;p. 2–7

 New! Complete this CE activity online at aorn.org/CE indicates that continuing education contact hours are available for this activity. Earn the contact hours by reading this article and taking the examination on pages 377–378 and then completing the answer sheet and learner evaluation on pages 379–380. The contact hours for this article expire September 30, 2012.This article is also approved for 7.2 (S) Category I credits by the American Board for Certification in Orthotics, Prosthetics, and Pedorthics for the following programs: orthotists, orthotic assistants, and orthotic technicians.The behavioral objectives and examination for this program were prepared by Rebecca Holm, RN, MSN, CNOR, clinical editor, with consultation from Susan Bakewell, RN, MS, BC, director, Center for Perioperative Education. Ms Holm and Ms Bakewell have no declared affiliations that could be perceived as potential conflicts of interest in publishing this article.This program meets criteria for CNOR and CRNFA recertification, as well as other continuing education requirements.AORN is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation.AORN recognizes these activities as continuing education for registered nurses. This recognition does not imply that AORN or the American Nurses Credentialing Center approves or endorses products mentioned in the activity.AORN is provider-approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider Number CEP 13019. Check with your state board of nursing for acceptance of this activity for relicensure.Editor's note: VEPTR is a trademark of Synthes Spine Company, West Chester, PA.

PII: S0001-2092(09)00551-1

doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2009.06.019

AORN Journal
Volume 90, Issue 3 , Pages 347-380, September 2009