AORN Journal
Volume 84, Issue 1, Supplement 1 , Pages S30-S36 , July 2006

Best Practices for Preventing a Retained Foreign Body

Notes 

  1. Beyea SC . Counting instruments and sponges . AORN Journal . August 2003;78:290–294
  2. “Standards for sponge, needle, and instrument procedures” . AORN Journal . May 1976;23:971–973
  3. In: “Recommended practices for sponge, sharp, and instrument counts” in Standards, Recommended Practices, and Guidelines . Denver: AORN, Inc; 2006;p. 459–468
  4. Murphy EK . “Operating room records, counts cause concern” (OR Nursing Law) . AORN Journal . June 1990;51:1606–1612
  5. Gawande AA , et al.   Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery . The New England Journal of Medicine . 16 January 2003;348:229–235
  6. Reason J . Human Error . New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990;
  7. American Nurses Association  . Code of Ethics for Nurses With Interpretive Statements . Washington, DC: ANA; 2001;
  8. “Statement on the prevention of retained foreign bodies after surgery” American College of Surgeons . http://www.facs.org/fellows_info/statements/st-51.html (accessed 15 May, 2006)
  9. Institute of Medicine  . Keeping Patients Safe: Transforming the Work Environment of Nurses . Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004;
  10. Carpino PA , et al.   Clinical benefits of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients with risk factors for saphenectomy wound infections undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting . The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery . January 2000;119:69–75
  11. In:  Byers JF ,  White SV editor. Patient Safety: Principles and Practices . New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc; 2004;p. 34

PII: S0001-2092(06)60083-5

doi: 10.1016/S0001-2092(06)60083-5

AORN Journal
Volume 84, Issue 1, Supplement 1 , Pages S30-S36 , July 2006

Article Tools